🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.